fri 01/08/2025

BBC Proms: Kholodenko, BBCNOW, Otaka review - exhilarating Lutosławski, underwhelming Rachmaninov | reviews, news & interviews

BBC Proms: Kholodenko, BBCNOW, Otaka review - exhilarating Lutosławski, underwhelming Rachmaninov

BBC Proms: Kholodenko, BBCNOW, Otaka review - exhilarating Lutosławski, underwhelming Rachmaninov

Polish composers to the fore in veteran conductor’s farewell

Tadaaki Otaka conducts the National Orchestra of Wales at the BBC Proms© BBC/ Mark Allan

According to the programme, Lutosławski’s Concerto for Orchestra is heard somewhere around the world every other week. In which case I’ve been unlucky in never having heard it live before, despite being a fan for nearly 30 years. So I was relieved that last night’s Prom’s outing – in Tadaaki Otaka’s farewell with the BBC National Orchestra of Wales, after a 40 year collaboration – didn’t disappoint.

The playing was urgent, colourful and glorious  - everything I could have wanted. Completed in 1945, the Concerto is a direct descendant of Bartók’s, and this came over loud and clear in the brass chorales of the last movement, and the emphasis on pairs of wind instruments throughout. But the scrunches are scrunchier (the low brass were fabulous), the taut menace edgier, and the filmic gleam of the orchestral writing somehow of a modern age, even though written less than a decade after the Bartók. The second movement had the tightest of xylophone and piccolo duets – really exposed but flawless, a wonderful solo tuba spot for Matt Lait and a percussion section diminuendo to nothing that was perfectly judged by Otaka.Vadym Kholodenko plays Rachmaninov at the PromsThe last movement carries the emotional weight, in its inexorably building passacaglia, and also provides the fun and games at the end, crunchy dissonances amid a dash for the line. It was terrific. Those who left at the interval – there were gaps in the second half where there were none in the first – did themselves no favours: this was the highlight of the concert.The other two pieces were also concertos, but from completely different traditions: a mid-century neoclassical concerto grosso and the biggest piano warhorse of them all. The opener was Grażyna Bacewicz’s Concerto for String Orchestra, her best-known piece, although that isn’t saying much. It was great, the violinist-composer writing really effectively for strings, whether in the scurrying outer movements redolent of Hindemith and Tippett, or in the more individual world of the central panel. This was by turns warm and cold, thanks to different types of bowing, the orchestration pared right down and the players responsive to Otaka’s batonless gestures.

I was bit more ambivalent about Vadym Kholodenko’s (pictured above by Mark Allan) take on Rachmaninov’s Second Piano Concerto. He is clearly a pianist of phenomenal technique, but I found his playing inward and not entirely suited to the huge expanse of the Albert Hall. The tempos of the outer movements were very deliberate, lacking forward momentum (a fine horn solo by Tim Thorpe notwithstanding), but I appreciated the no-nonsense playing in solo moments, no tortured rubato here. The middle movement was the best: I was reminded how wonderfully – and subtly – it is scored. Nicholas Carpenter’s clarinet initial presentation of the big tune duly melted my heart, and in this movement the intimate piano playing worked better. Elsewhere this archetype of heroic pianism needed more heroics: this maybe wasn’t the venue to try to reinvent it?

Bernard Hughes on Bluesky

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £49,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters